Server IconMy Providers0

Compare Celer vs Connext Bridges providers

This page compares Celer and Connext across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Celer, Connext.

47 providers and 47 plans to compare
47
Offer
Chain
Technology
TX Speed SLA
Throughput SLA
Open Source
Support
Available APIs
Monitoring & Analytics
Additional Features
Asset Types
Price
Economical Security
Economical Security Note
Audits Performed
Decentralization
SDK
Supported Chains
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
Celer
mainnet
Lock & Mint + Message Passing
Yes
Contact us form
REST, SDK, WebSocket
Transaction Monitoring, CelerScan
Decentralized cross‑chain transfers
wFIL, wETH, wBTC, USDC, USDT
Gas Fee
Yes
January 2023, by CertiK, January 2023, by PeckShield, January 2023, by SlowMist
Decentralized
Node.JS
ethereum, polygon, bnb chain, avalanche, arbitrum, optimism, base, linea, astar, shiden, fantom, unichain, zksync era, arbitrum nova, aptos, flow evm, metis, oasis emerald, evmos, aurora, moonbeam, moonriver, boba, gnosis, aura mainnet, bitcoin, blast, conflux, filecoin, flow cadence, gravity alpha mainnet, injective, kava evm co-chain, klaytn, manta pacific mainnet, milkomeda c1, oasis sapphire, oasis hub-layer, platon, redbelly, sx, scroll, sui mainnet, x layer, opbnb
BridgeDocs
Connext
mainnet
Cross‑chain Messaging
Yes
Discord
Cross‑chain Transfers, Liquidity Provision
Low fee intent-layer bridging, xERC‑20 tokens
ETH, ERC‑20
Gas Fee + small protocol fee
Yes
Decentralized
TypeScript SDK, Web UI
ethereum, bnb chain, gnosis, metis, arbitrum, optimism, base, linea, mode
BridgeDocs
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE