Compare Chainlink vs TON Bridges providers

This page compares Chainlink and TON across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Chainlink, TON.

47 providers and 47 plans to compare

47

Offer

Chain

Technology

TX Speed SLA

Throughput SLA

Open Source

Support

Available APIs

Monitoring & Analytics

Additional Features

Asset Types

Price

Economical Security

Economical Security Note

Audits Performed

Decentralization

SDK

Supported Chains

Tags

Minimize Sidebar

Chainlink

Bridge

mainnet

Oracle‑Powered Asset & Messaging Bridge

Yes

Discord

Cross‑chain Messaging, Token Transfer

Based on Chainlink CCIP, Enterprise‑grade relayer architecture

ERC‑20, Stablecoins, NFT

Gas Fee + relayer fee

Yes

Multiple audits

Decentralized

TypeScript

ethereum, arbitrum, avalanche, base, optimism, linea, mantle, bnb chain, polygon, aptos, solana, celo, blast, gnosis, metis, astar, mode

TON

mainnet

Cross‑chain Bridge

No

Telegram

Bridge API

Decentralized oracle-based validation, Inbound and outbound transfers

Stablecoins, ERC-20, DAI, Toncoin

1-5 TON + Gas fee

Yes

Decentralized

TypeScript, JavaScript

ethereum, ton, bnb chain

chain.love

Documentation Whitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE