Server IconMy Providers0

Compare Hashport vs Wanchain Bridges providers

This page compares Hashport and Wanchain across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Hashport, Wanchain.

47 providers and 47 plans to compare
47
Offer
Chain
Technology
TX Speed SLA
Throughput SLA
Open Source
Support
Available APIs
Monitoring & Analytics
Additional Features
Asset Types
Price
Economical Security
Economical Security Note
Audits Performed
Decentralization
SDK
Supported Chains
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
Hashport
mainnet
Cross‑chain Asset Transfer
Yes
Discord
Asset Transfer
Secure Hedera-to-EVM bridging
ETH, ERC‑20
Gas Fee
Yes
Partially Decentralized
Web UI
ethereum, arbitrum, avalanche, cronos, bnb chain, polygon, base, fantom, optimism, moonbeam, aurora
BridgeDocs
Wanchain
mainnet
Asset Bridge
Yes
Telegram, Email, Discord
Asset Transfer
Bridge Monitoring
Cross-chain asset bridging, WAN token discounts
ERC-20: USDT
10.2%, min. 0.2 USD, has discounts up to 80% based on WAN token holdings
Yes
Regular audits
Decentralized
Node.JS SDK
ethereum, bnb chain, polygon, avalanche, astar, sonic, unichain, world chain, wanchain, bitcoin, arbitrum, base, bitrock, blast, cardano, celo, dogecoin, energi, fantom, kava, linea, litecoin, metis, moonbeam, moonriver, noble, okt chain, optimism, odyssey, plyr, polkadot, polygon zkevm, shido, solana, songbird, sui, telos, tron, vechain, vinuchain, x layer, xdc, xrp ledger, edexa, f(x) core, zksync era
BridgeDocs
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE