Server IconMy Providers0

Compare Polyhedra Network vs Wanchain Bridges providers

This page compares Polyhedra Network and Wanchain across Bridges provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Polyhedra Network, Wanchain.

47 providers and 47 plans to compare
47
Offer
Chain
Technology
TX Speed SLA
Throughput SLA
Open Source
Support
Available APIs
Monitoring & Analytics
Additional Features
Asset Types
Price
Economical Security
Economical Security Note
Audits Performed
Decentralization
SDK
Supported Chains
Tags
Minimize Sidebar
Polyhedra Network
testnet
zk‑Bridge with Zero‑Knowledge State Proofs
Yes
Discord
Token & NFT Transfer, Cross‑chain Messaging
zk proofs for trustless state verification, Supports 20+ L1/L2s
ERC‑20, NFT
Gas Fee + ZK fee
Yes
Platform audits reported
Decentralized
TypeScript
ethereum testnet, expchain testnet, bnb chain testnet
BridgeDocs
Wanchain
mainnet
Asset Bridge
Yes
Telegram, Email, Discord
Asset Transfer
Bridge Monitoring
Cross-chain asset bridging, WAN token discounts
ERC-20: USDT
10.2%, min. 0.2 USD, has discounts up to 80% based on WAN token holdings
Yes
Regular audits
Decentralized
Node.JS SDK
ethereum, bnb chain, polygon, avalanche, astar, sonic, unichain, world chain, wanchain, bitcoin, arbitrum, base, bitrock, blast, cardano, celo, dogecoin, energi, fantom, kava, linea, litecoin, metis, moonbeam, moonriver, noble, okt chain, optimism, odyssey, plyr, polkadot, polygon zkevm, shido, solana, songbird, sui, telos, tron, vechain, vinuchain, x layer, xdc, xrp ledger, edexa, f(x) core, zksync era
BridgeDocs
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE